Climate Stress Testing

Literature Cited

1. Acharya VV, Engle R, Pastore S, Stroebel J. 2023. Climate transition risk and energy prices. Work. Pap. NYU Stern Sch. Bus. New York:
   [Google Scholar]
2. Acharya VV, Engle R, Pierret D. 2014. Testing macroprudential stress tests: the risk of regulatory risk weights. J. Monet. Econ. 65:36–53
   [Google Scholar]
3. Acharya VV, Engle R, Wang O. 2023. Incentives to decarbonize and innovate: the role of net zero commitments. Work. Pap. NYU Stern Sch. Bus. New York:
   [Google Scholar]
4. Acharya VV, Johnson T, Sundaresan S, Tomunen T. 2022. Is physical climate risk priced? Evidence from regional variation in exposure to heat stress NBER Work. Pap. 30445
   [Google Scholar]
5. ACPR (Aut. Contrôle Prudent. Résolut.) 2021. A first assessment of financial risks stemming from climate change: the main results of the 2020 climate pilot exercise. Rep. ACPR Banque de France, Paris: https://c2e2.unepccc.org/kmsbject/a-first-assessment-of-financial-risks-stemming-from-climate-change-results-of-the-2020-climate-pilot-exercise
   [Google Scholar]
6. Addoum JM, Ng DT, Ortiz-Bobea A. 2020. Temperature shocks and establishment sales. Rev. Financ. Stud. 33:31331–66
   [Google Scholar]
7. Addoum JM, Ng DT, Ortiz-Bobea A. 2023. Temperature shocks and industry earnings news. J. Financ. Econ. 150:11–45
   [Google Scholar]
8. Alekseev G, Giglio S, Maingi Q, Selgrad J, Stroebel J. 2022. A quantity-based approach to constructing climate risk hedge portfolios NBER Work. Pap. 30703
   [Google Scholar]
9. Annicchiarico B, Carattini S, Fischer C, Heutel G. 2021. Business cycles and environmental policy: literature review and policy implications NBER Work. Pap. 29032
   [Google Scholar]
10. APRA (Aust. Prudent. Regul. Auth.) 2021. Climate vulnerability assessment Inf. Pap. APRA Sydney: https://www.apra.gov.au/climate-vulnerability-assessment
    [Google Scholar]
11. Auh JK, Choi J, Deryugina T, Park T. 2022. Natural disasters and municipal bonds NBER Work. Pap. 30280
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bailey A. 2020. The time to push ahead on tackling climate change Talk presented at Corporation of London Green Horizon Summit, Novemb. 9. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/speech/2020/andrew-bailey-speech-corporation-of-london-green-horizon-summit
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bailey M, Cao R, Kuchler T, Stroebel J. 2018a. The economic effects of social networks: evidence from the housing market. J. Political Econ. 126:62224–76
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bailey M, Cao R, Kuchler T, Stroebel J, Wong A. 2018b. Social connectedness: measurement, determinants, and effects. J. Econ. Perspect. 32:3259–80
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bailey M, Dávila E, Kuchler T, Stroebel J. 2019. House price beliefs and mortgage leverage choice. Rev. Econ. Stud. 86:62403–52
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bailey M, Johnston DM, Koenen M, Kuchler T, Russel D, Stroebel J. 2020. Social networks shape beliefs and behavior: evidence from social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic NBER Work. Pap. 28234
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bakkensen LA, Barrage L. 2022. Going underwater? Flood risk belief heterogeneity and coastal home price dynamics. Rev. Financ. Stud. 35:83666–709
    [Google Scholar]
18. Baldauf M, Garlappi L, Yannelis C. 2020. Does climate change affect real estate prices? Only if you believe in it. Rev. Financ. Stud. 33:31256–95
    [Google Scholar]
19. Bank Engl 2021. Key elements of the 2021 Biennial Exploratory Scenario: financial risks from climate change. Rep. Bank Engl., London: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/stress-testing/2021/key-elements-2021-biennial-exploratory-scenario-financial-risks-climate-change
    [Google Scholar]
20. Bank Engl 2022. Results of the 2021 Climate Biennial Exploratory Scenario (CBES) Results Rep. Bank Engl. London: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/stress-testing/2022/results-of-the-2021-climate-biennial-exploratory-scenario
    [Google Scholar]
21. Bansal R, Kiku D, Ochoa M. 2021. Climate change risk. Work. Pap. Duke Univ. Durham, NC:
    [Google Scholar]
22. Barro RJ. 2015. Environmental protection, rare disasters and discount rates. Economica 82:3251–23
    [Google Scholar]
23. Battiston S, Mandel A, Monasterolo I, Schütze F, Visentin G. 2017. A climate stress-test of the financial system. Nat. Clim. Change 7:4283–88
    [Google Scholar]
24. Baudino P, Svoronos JP. 2021. Stress-testing banks for climate change—a comparison of practices. Financ. Stabil. Inst. Insights 34 Bank Int. Settl. Basel, Switz.:
    [Google Scholar]
25. Benincasa E, Kabas G, Ongena S. 2022. “There is no planet B,” but for banks there are “countries B to Z”: domestic climate policy and cross-border bank lending. Res. Pap. 22-28 Swiss Finance Inst. Zurich:
    [Google Scholar]
26. Berg T, Saunders A, Steffen S, Streitz D. 2017. Mind the gap: the difference between U.S. and European loan rates. Rev. Financ. Stud. 30:3948–87
    [Google Scholar]
27. Bernstein A, Billings SB, Gustafson MT, Lewis R. 2022. Partisan residential sorting on climate change risk. J. Financ. Econ. 146:3989–1015
    [Google Scholar]
28. Bernstein A, Gustafson MT, Lewis R. 2019. Disaster on the horizon: the price effect of sea level rise. J. Financ. Econ. 134:2253–72
    [Google Scholar]
29. Billings MB, Ryan SG, Yan H. 2022. Climate risk, population migration, and banks' lending and deposit-taking activities. Work. Pap. NYU Stern Sch. Bus. New York:
    [Google Scholar]
30. BIS (Bank Int. Settl.) 2020. Climate-related financial risks: a survey on current initiatives. Rep. BIS Basel, Switz.: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d502.htm
    [Google Scholar]
31. BIS (Bank Int. Settl.) 2021. Climate-related risk drivers and their transmission channels. Rep. BIS Basel, Switz.: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d517.htm
    [Google Scholar]
32. Blickle K, Fleckenstein Q, Hillenbrand S, Saunders A. 2020. The myth of the lead arranger's share Staff Rep. 922 Fed. Reserve Bank N. Y.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Blickle K, Hamerling SN, Morgan DP. 2021. How bad are weather disasters for banks? Staff Rep. 990 Fed. Reserve Bank N. Y.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Blickle K, Parlatore C, Saunders A. 2021. Specialization in banking Staff Rep. 967 Fed. Reserve Bank N. Y.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Blickle K, Santos JA. 2022. Unintended consequences of “mandatory” flood insurance Staff Rep. 1012 Fed. Reserve Bank N. Y.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Board Gov. Fed. Reserve Syst 2023. Pilot climate scenario analysis exercise. Particip. Instr. Board Gov. Fed. Reserve Syst. New York: https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/csa-instructions-20230117.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
37. Bolton P, Despres M, Pereira Da Silva LA, Samama F, Svartzman R 2020. The green swan: central banking and financial stability in the age of climate change. Rep. Bank Int. Settl. Basel, Switz.:
    [Google Scholar]
38. Bolton P, Kacperczyk MT. 2023. Firm commitments NBER Work. Pap. 31244
    [Google Scholar]
39. Borio C, Drehmann M, Tsatsaronis K. 2014. Stress-testing macro stress testing: Does it live up to expectations?. J. Financ. Stabil. 12:3–15
    [Google Scholar]
40. Boustan LP, Kahn ME, Rhode PW, Yanguas ML. 2020. The effect of natural disasters on economic activity in US counties: a century of data. J. Urban Econ. 118:103257
    [Google Scholar]
41. Brainard L. 2021. Building climate scenario analysis on the foundations of economic research Talk presented at 2021 Federal Reserve Stress Testing Research Conference, online, Oct. 7
    [Google Scholar]
42. Brei M, Mohan P, Strobl E. 2019. The impact of natural disasters on the banking sector: evidence from hurricane strikes in the Caribbean. Q. Rev. Econ. Finance 72:232–39
    [Google Scholar]
43. Brunetti C, Caramichael J, Crosignani M, Dennis B, Kotta G et al. 2022. Climate-related financial stability risks for the United States: methods and applications. Finance Econ. Discuss. Ser. 2022-043 Board Gov. Fed. Reserve Syst. Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
44. Carattini S, Heutel G, Melkadze G. 2021. Climate policy, financial frictions, and transition risk NBER Work. Pap. 28525
    [Google Scholar]
45. Carattini S, Kim G, Melkadze G, Pommeret A. 2022. Carbon taxes and tariffs, financial frictions, and international spillovers. Work. Pap. Georgia State Univ. Athens:
    [Google Scholar]
46. Carattini S, Sen S. 2019. Carbon taxes and stranded assets: evidence from Washington State. Work. Pap. 7785 CESifo Munich, Ger.:
    [Google Scholar]
47. Carney M. 2015. Breaking the tragedy of the horizon: climate change and financial stability Talk presented at Lloyd's of London, Sept. 29. https://www.bis.org/review/r151009a.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
48. Cartellier F. 2022. Climate stress testing, an answer to the challenge of assessing climate-related risks to the financial system? Work. Pap. Inst. Polytech. Paris:
    [Google Scholar]
49. Chava S. 2014. Environmental externalities and cost of capital. Manag. Sci. 60:92223–47
    [Google Scholar]
50. Chavaz M. 2016. Dis-integrating credit markets: diversification, securitization, and lending in a recovery. Work. Pap. 617 Bank Engl. London:
    [Google Scholar]
51. Chodorow-Reich G, Darmouni O, Luck S, Plosser M. 2022. Bank liquidity provision across the firm size distribution. J. Financ. Econ. 144:3908–32
    [Google Scholar]
52. Choi D, Gao Z, Jiang W. 2020. Attention to global warming. Rev. Financ. Stud. 33:31112–45
    [Google Scholar]
53. Correa R, He A, Herpfer C, Lel U. 2020. The rising tide lifts some interest rates: climate change, natural disasters and loan pricing. Work. Pap. 889/2023 Eur. Corp. Gov. Inst. Brussels:
    [Google Scholar]
54. Cortès KR, Strahan PE. 2017. Tracing out capital flows: how financially integrated banks respond to natural disasters. J. Financ. Econ. 125:1182–99
    [Google Scholar]
55. Cuculiza C, Kumar A, Xin W, Zhang C. 2021. Climate change, analyst forecasts, and market behavior. Work. Pap. Univ. Miami Coral Gables, FL:
    [Google Scholar]
56. Dafermos Y, Nikolaidi M. 2021. How can green differentiated capital requirements affect climate risks? A dynamic macrofinancial analysis. J. Financ. Stabil. 54:100871
    [Google Scholar]
57. Das A, Majilla T, Saurav S. 2023. Natural disasters, interest rates dynamics, and economic activities. Work. Pap. Indian Inst. Manag. Ahmedabad:
    [Google Scholar]
58. de Boyrie ME, Pavlova I. 2020. Analysing the link between environmental performance and sovereign credit risk. Appl. Econ. 52:545949–66
    [Google Scholar]
59. De Marco F, Nicola L 2023. Climate, amenities and banking: El Niño in the US. Press Discuss. Pap. 17909 Cent. Econ. Policy Res. London:
    [Google Scholar]
60. Delis MD, De Greiff K, Ongena S. 2019. Being stranded with fossil fuel reserves? Climate policy risk and the pricing of bank loans. Res. Pap. 18-10 Swiss Finance Inst. Zurich:
    [Google Scholar]
61. Di Marco M, Baker ML, Daszak P, De Barro P, Eskew EA et al. 2020. Sustainable development must account for pandemic risk. PNAS 117:83888–92
    [Google Scholar]
62. Diluiso F, Annicchiarico B, Kalkuhl M, Minx JC. 2021. Climate actions and macro-financial stability: the role of central banks. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 110:102548
    [Google Scholar]
63. Dlugosz J, Gam YK, Gopalan R, Skrastins J. 2022. Decision-making delegation in banks. Work. Pap. Board Gov. Fed. Reserve Syst. Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
64. Dunz N, Emambakhsh T, Hennig T, Kaijser M, Kouratzoglou C, Salleo C. 2021. ECB's economy-wide climate stress test. Occas. Pap. 2021/281 Eur. Cent. Bank Frankfurt, Ger.:
    [Google Scholar]
65. Dunz N, Naqvi A, Monasterolo I. 2021. Climate sentiments, transition risk, and financial stability in a stock-flow consistent model. J. Financ. Stabil. 54:100872
    [Google Scholar]
66. ECB (Eur. Cent. Bank) 2022a. 2022 climate risk stress test Rep. ECB Frankfurt, Ger.: https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/ecb/pub/pdf/ssm.climate_stress_testeport.20220708 2e3cc0999f.en.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
67. ECB (Eur. Cent. Bank) 2022b. ECB report on good practices for climate stress testing Rep. ECB Frankfurt, Ger.: https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/ecb/pub/pdf/ssm.202212_ECBreport_on_good_practices_for_CST 539227e0c1.en.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
68. ECB (Eur. Cent. Bank) 2022c. ECB takes further steps to incorporate climate change into its monetary policy operations Press Release ECB Frankfurt, Ger.: July 4
    [Google Scholar]
69. Engle R. 2002. Dynamic conditional correlation: a simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 20:3339–50
    [Google Scholar]
70. Engle R. 2009. Anticipating Correlations: A New Paradigm for Risk Management Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
71. Engle R, Giglio S, Kelly B, Lee H, Stroebel J. 2020. Hedging climate change news. Rev. Financ. Stud. 33:31184–216
    [Google Scholar]
72. Ens E, Johnston CMT. 2020. Scenario analysis and the economic and financial risks from climate change Staff Discuss. Pap. 2020-3 Bank Can. Ottawa:
    [Google Scholar]
73. Faccini R, Matin R, Skiadopoulos GS. 2022. Dissecting climate risks: Are they reflected in stock prices? Work. Pap. Dan. Nationalbank Copenhagen:
    [Google Scholar]
74. Frahm G, Junker M, Schmidt R. 2005. Estimating the tail-dependence coefficient: properties and pitfalls. Insur. Math. Econ. 37:180–100
    [Google Scholar]
75. FSB (Financ. Stabil. Board), NGFS (Netw. Green. Financ. Syst.) 2022. Climate scenario analysis by jurisdictions: initial findings and lessons Rep. FSB Basel, Switz.: https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/P151122.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
76. FSOC (Financ. Stabil. Overs. Counc.) 2021. Report on climate-related financial risk: 2021 Rep. FSOC Washington, DC: https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/261/FSOC-Climate-Report.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
77. Ganong P, Noel P. 2023. Why do borrowers default on mortgages?. Q. J. Econ. 138:21001–65
    [Google Scholar]
78. Ge S, Lam A, Lewis R. 2022. The costs of hedging disaster risk and home prices: evidence from flood insurance. Work. Pap. NYU Stern Sch. Bus. New York:
    [Google Scholar]
79. Giglio S, Kelly B, Stroebel J. 2021. Climate finance. Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ. 13:15–36
    [Google Scholar]
80. Giglio S, Kuchler T, Stroebel J, Zeng X. 2023a. Biodiversity risk NBER Work. Pap. 31137
    [Google Scholar]
81. Giglio S, Maggiori M, Rao K, Stroebel J, Weber A. 2021. Climate change and long-run discount rates: evidence from real estate. Rev. Financ. Stud. 34:83527–71
    [Google Scholar]
82. Giglio S, Maggiori M, Stroebel J, Tan Z, Utkus S, Xu X. 2023b. Four facts about ESG beliefs and investor portfolios NBER Work. Pap. 31114
    [Google Scholar]
83. Goldsmith-Pinkham P, Gustafson MT, Lewis RC, Schwert M. 2023. Sea-level rise exposure and municipal bond yields. Rev. Financ. Stud. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhad041
    [Google Scholar]
84. Gostlow G. 2021. Pricing physical climate risk in the cross-section of returns. Work. Pap. London Sch. Econ. Political Sci. London:
    [Google Scholar]
85. Goulder L, Hafstead M. 2018. Confronting the Climate Challenge: U.S. Policy Options New York: Columbia Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
86. Grippa P, Schmittmann J, Suntheim F. 2019. Climate change and financial risk. Finance Dev 56:26–29
    [Google Scholar]
87. He Z, Xiong W. 2012. Rollover risk and credit risk. J. Finance 67:2391–430
    [Google Scholar]
88. Hong H, Karolyi GA, Scheinkman JA. 2020. Climate finance. Rev. Financ. Stud. 33:31011–23
    [Google Scholar]
89. Hong Kong Monet. Auth 2021. Pilot banking sector climate risk stress test Rep. Hong Kong Monet. Auth. Hong Kong: https://www.hkma.gov.hk/media/eng/doc/key-functions/banking-stability/Pilot_banking_sector_climate_risk_stress_test.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
90. Huynh TD, Xia Y. 2021. Climate change news risk and corporate bond returns. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 56:61985–2009
    [Google Scholar]
91. Int. Monet. Fund 2022. Staff guidance note on the sovereign risk and debt sustainability framework for market access countries. Policy Pap. 2022/039 Int. Monet. Fund Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
92. IPCC (Intergov. Panel Clim. Change) 2019. Special report on climate change and land Spec. Rep. IPCC Geneva: https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl
    [Google Scholar]
93. Islam E, Singh M. 2022. Information on hot stuff: Do lenders pay attention to climate risk? Work. Pap. Monash Univ. Melbourne, Aust.:
    [Google Scholar]
94. Ivanov I, Kruttli MS, Watugala SW. 2022. Banking on carbon: corporate lending and cap-and-trade policy. Work. Pap. Fed. Reserve Bank Chicago
    [Google Scholar]
95. Javadi S, Masum AA. 2021. The impact of climate change on the cost of bank loans. J. Corp. Finance 69:102019
    [Google Scholar]
96. Joe H. 1997. Multivariate Models and Multivariate Dependence Concepts Boca Raton, FL: CRC
    [Google Scholar]
97. Jorgenson DW, Goettle RJ, Ho MS, Wilcoxen PJ. 2013. Double Dividend: Environmental Taxes and Fiscal Reform in the United States Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
98. Jorgenson DW, Goettle RJ, Ho MS, Wilcoxen PJ. 2018. The welfare consequences of taxing carbon. Clim. Change Econ 9:1840013
    [Google Scholar]
99. Jung H, Engle R, Berner R. 2021. CRISK: measuring the climate risk exposure of the financial system. Staff Rep. 977 Fed. Reserve Bank N. Y.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Jung H, Engle R, Ge S, Zeng X. 2023. Measuring the climate risk exposure of insurers. Staff Rep. 1066 Fed. Reserve Bank N. Y.
     [Google Scholar]
101. Jung H, Santos JA, Seltzer L. 2023. U.S. banks' exposures to climate transition risks Staff Rep. 1058 Fed. Reserve Bank N. Y.
     [Google Scholar]
102. Kacperczyk MT, Peydró JL. 2022. Carbon emissions and the bank-lending channel. Work. Pap. Imperial Coll. London
     [Google Scholar]
103. Känzig DR. 2021. The macroeconomic effects of oil supply news: evidence from OPEC announcements. Am. Econ. Rev. 111:41092–125
     [Google Scholar]
104. Khwaja AI, Mian A. 2008. Tracing the impact of bank liquidity shocks: evidence from an emerging market. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:41413–42
     [Google Scholar]
105. Krueger P, Sautner Z, Starks LT. 2020. The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. Rev. Financ. Stud. 33:31067–111
     [Google Scholar]
106. Kuchler T, Stroebel J. 2021. Social finance. Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ. 13:37–55
     [Google Scholar]
107. Kundu S, Park S, Vats N. 2021. The geography of bank deposits and the origins of aggregate fluctuations. Work. Pap. UCLA Anderson Sch. Manag. Los Angeles:
     [Google Scholar]
108. Kuroda H. 2021. The Bank of Japan's strategy on climate change. Rep. Bank Jpn. Tokyo: https://www.boj.or.jp/en/about/press/koen_2021/data/ko210727a.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
109. Laeven L, Popov AA. 2022. Carbon taxes and the geography of fossil lending. Work. Pap. 2762 Eur. Cent. Bank Frankfurt, Ger.:
     [Google Scholar]
110. Lamperti F, Bosetti V, Roventini A, Tavoni M, Treibich T. 2021. Three green financial policies to address climate risks. J. Financ. Stabil. 54:100875
     [Google Scholar]
111. Lane PR. 2019. Climate change and the Irish financial system Econ. Lett. 2019-1 Cent. Bank Irel. Dublin:
     [Google Scholar]
112. Litterman B. 2023. Selling stranded assets: profit, protection, and prosperity. Fact Sheet Intent. Endow. Netw. Andover, MA.: https://www.intentionalendowments.org/selling_stranded_assets_profit_protection_and_prosperity
     [Google Scholar]
113. Litterman B, Martinez-Diaz L, Keenan JM, Moch S, Gillers D, Behnam R. 2021. Managing climate risk in the U.S. financial system Rep. US Commod. Futur. Trad. Comm. Washington, DC:
     [Google Scholar]
114. Maher D. 2022. Testimony on exploring financial risks on banking posed by climate change Testimony presented to New York State Senate Committees on Banks, Finance, and Environmental Conservation, online, March 1. https://www.newyorkfed.org/newsevents/speeches/2022/mah220301
     [Google Scholar]
115. McNeil AJ, Frey R, Embrechts P. 2015. Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. , Revis. ed..
     [Google Scholar]
116. Morris S, Shin HS. 2016. Illiquidity component of credit risk. Int. Econ. Rev. 57:41135–48
     [Google Scholar]
117. NGFS (Netw. Green. Financ. Syst.) 2019. Origin and purpose Fact Sheet NGFS Paris: https://www.ngfs.net/en/about-us/governance/origin-and-purpose
     [Google Scholar]
118. NGFS (Netw. Green. Financ. Syst.) 2020. NGFS climate scenarios for central banks and supervisors Rep. NGFS Paris: https://www.ngfs.net/sites/default/files/medias/documents/820184_ngfs_scenarios_final_version_v6_0.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
119. NGFS (Netw. Green. Financ. Syst.) 2021. NGFS climate scenarios for central banks and supervisors Rep. NGFS Paris: https://www.ngfs.net/en/ngfs-climate-scenarios-central-banks-and-supervisors-june-2021
     [Google Scholar]
120. NGFS (Netw. Green. Financ. Syst.) 2022. Running the NGFS scenarios in G-cubed: a tale of two modelling frameworks Occas. Pap. NGFS Paris: https://www.ngfs.net/en/running-ngfs-scenarios-g-cubed-tale-two-modelling-frameworks
     [Google Scholar]
121. Nguyen DD, Ongena S, Qi S, Sila V. 2022. Climate change risk and the cost of mortgage credit. Rev. Finance 26:61509–49
     [Google Scholar]
122. Nordhaus WD, Boyer J. 2000. Warming the World Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
123. Oehmke M, Opp M. 2021. Green capital requirements. Work. Pap. London Sch. Econ. Political Sci. London:
     [Google Scholar]
124. Off. Sci. Technol. Policy 2022. Climate and energy implications of crypto-assets Rep. White House Washington, DC.: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/09-2022-Crypto-Assets-and-Climate-Report.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
125. Painter M. 2020. An inconvenient cost: the effects of climate change on municipal bonds. J. Financ. Econ. 135:2468–82
     [Google Scholar]
126. Pankratz N, Schiller C. 2021. Climate change and adaptation in global supply-chain networks Finance Econ. Discuss. Ser. 2022-056 Board Gov. Fed. Reserve Syst. Washington, DC:
     [Google Scholar]
127. Pástor L, Stambaugh RF, Taylor LA. 2021. Sustainable investing in equilibrium. J. Financ. Econ. 142:2550–71
     [Google Scholar]
128. Pástor L, Stambaugh RF, Taylor LA. 2022. Dissecting green returns. J. Financ. Econ. 146:2403–24
     [Google Scholar]
129. Powell JH. 2023. Panel on “Central Bank Independence and the Mandate—Evolving Views.” Talk presented at Symposium on Central Bank Independence Sveriges Riksbank Stockholm: Jan. 10
     [Google Scholar]
130. Ramelli S, Wagner AF, Zeckhauser RJ, Ziegler A. 2021. Investor rewards to climate responsibility: stock-price responses to the opposite shocks of the 2016 and 2020 US elections. Rev. Corp. Finance Stud. 10:4748–87
     [Google Scholar]
131. Reinders HJ, Schoenmaker D, van Dijk M. 2023a. A finance approach to climate stress testing. J. Int. Money Finance 131:102797
     [Google Scholar]
132. Reinders HJ, Schoenmaker D, van Dijk MA. 2023b. Climate risk stress testing: a conceptual review. Work. Pap. Rotterdam Sch. Manag. Rotterdam, Neth.:
     [Google Scholar]
133. Roncoroni A, Battiston S, Escobar-Farfán LOL, Martinez-Jaramillo S. 2021. Climate risk and financial stability in the network of banks and investment funds. J. Financ. Stabil. 54:100870
     [Google Scholar]
134. Roth Tran B, Wilson DJ 2020. The local economic impact of natural disasters. Work. Pap. 2020-34 Fed. Reserve Bank San Francisco
     [Google Scholar]
135. Seltzer LH, Starks L, Zhu Q. 2022. Climate regulatory risk and corporate bonds NBER Work. Pap. 29994
     [Google Scholar]
136. Sibuya M. 1960. Bivariate extreme statistics, I. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 11:3195–210
     [Google Scholar]
137. Steindl FG, Weinrobe MD. 1983. Natural hazards and deposit behavior at financial institutions: a note. J. Bank. Finance 7:1111–18
     [Google Scholar]
138. Stroebel J, Wurgler J. 2021. What do you think about climate finance?. J. Financ. Econ. 142:2487–98
     [Google Scholar]
139. van Benthem AA, Crooks E, Giglio S, Schwob E, Stroebel J. 2022. The effect of climate risks on the interactions between financial markets and energy companies. Nat. Energy 7:8690–97
     [Google Scholar]
140. van Dijk MA. 2020. Assessing climate risk for investment portfolios: an overview for Dutch pension funds. Work. Pap. Erasmus Univ. Rotterdam, Neth.:
     [Google Scholar]
141. Vermeulen R, Schets E, Lohuis M, Kölbl B, Jansen DJ, Heeringa W. 2021. The heat is on: a framework for measuring financial stress under disruptive energy transition scenarios. Ecol. Econ. 190:107205
     [Google Scholar]
142. Weitzman ML. 2012. Rare disasters, tail-hedged investments, and risk-adjusted discount rates NBER Work. Pap. 18496
     [Google Scholar]
143. Weitzman ML. 2014. Fat tails and the social cost of carbon. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:5544–46
     [Google Scholar]
144. Woods S. 2022. Climate capital Talk presented at Global Association of Risk Professionals Webcast, online, May 24. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/speech/2022/may/sam-woods-speech-on-the-results-of-the-climate-bes-exercise-on-financial-risks-from-climate-change
     [Google Scholar]
145. Yellen JL. 2021. Finance Committee questions for the record. Hearing on the nomination of Dr. Janet Yellen: responses by Dr. Yellen. Transcr. US Sen. Comm. Finance Washington, DC: Jan. 21. https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Dr%20Janet%20Yellen%20Senate%20Finance%20Committee%20QFRs%2001%2021%202021.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
146. Yellen JL. 2023. Remarks by Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen at the First Meeting of the FSOC Climate-Related Financial Risk Advisory Committee. Press Release US Treas. Washington, DC: March 7. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1325
     [Google Scholar]