1932

Abstract

From the earliest studies examining the impacts of the coal-powered Industrial Revolution, the field of sociology has possessed an intimate, if often implicit, interest in the interconnectedness of fossil fuels and modernity. With the looming climate crisis, the world must rapidly wean itself from these resources in favor of others that emit little to no greenhouse gasses. And while this energy transition will likely have profound social implications, it has only recently begun to receive sustained attention from sociologists across subfields. Consequently, although debates have emphasized the technological and market dimensions of this shift, its relational dimensions and human aspects have remained relatively marginal. In this article, we review research on the social impacts of fossil fuel production and transitions to renewables. Such work is critical and urgent, since the main barriers to combating the climate crisis are neither technological nor economic; they are, instead, deeply social.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-012201
2023-07-31
2024-06-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/49/1/annurev-soc-031021-012201.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-012201&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adams R. 1975. Energy and Structure: A Theory of Social Power Austin: Univ. Texas Press
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allan B, Lewis J, Oatley T. 2021. Green industrial policy and the global transformation of climate politics. Glob. Environ. Politics 21:41–19
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Araújo K. 2017. Low Carbon Energy Transitions: Turning Points in National Policy and Innovation Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Araújo K. 2022. Routledge Handbook of Energy Transitions. Milton Park, UK: Taylor & Francis
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Arboleda M. 2020. Planetary Mine: Territories of Extraction Under Late Capitalism London: Verso
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Avila-Calero S. 2017. Contesting energy transitions: wind power and conflicts in the isthmus of Tehuantepec. J. Political Ecol. 24:1992–1012
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baka J. 2017. Making space for energy: wasteland development, enclosures, and energy dispossessions. Antipode 49:4977–96
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Baker S. 2011. Unmasking project finance: risk mitigation, risk inducement, and an invitation to development disaster?. Tex. J. Oil Gas Energy Law 6:2273–334
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Baker S 2015. Project finance and sustainable development in the Global South. International Environmental Law and the Global South S Alam, S Atapattu, C Gonzalez, J Razzaque 338–55. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Beckfield J. 2010. The social structure of the world polity. Am. J. Sociol. 115:41018–68
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Beckfield J, Castro B, Evrard DA, Ulama D, Booker D et al. 2022. How the Gulf Coast can lead the energy transition Rep. Roosevelt Proj., MIT Cent. Energy Environ. Res. Cambridge, MA:
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Beckfield J, Evrard DA, Sampson R, Waters M. 2021. Social impacts of energy transition Rep. Roosevelt Proj., MIT Cent. Energy Environ. Res. Cambridge, MA:
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bell S. 2016. Fighting King Coal: The Challenges to Micromobilization in Central Appalachia Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Black D, McKinnish T, Sanders S. 2005. The economic impact of the coal boom and bust. Econ. J. 115:449–76
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bluestone B, Harrison B. 1982. The Deindustrialization of America New York: Basic Books
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Böhringer C, Fischer C, Rosendahl KE, Rutherford TF. 2022. Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments. Nat. Clim. Change 12:122–29
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Bond T, Bellouin N, Berntsen T, DeAngelo B, Doherty S et al. 2013. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: a scientific assessment. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118:115380–552
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Brady D, Wallace M. 2001. Deindustrialization and poverty: manufacturing decline and AFDC recipiency in Lake County, Indiana 1964–93. Sociol. Forum 6:2321–58
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Brand J. 2006. The effects of job displacement on job quality: findings from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study. Res. Soc. Stratif. Mobil. 24:3275–98
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Brand J, Burgard S. 2008. Job displacement and social participation over the lifecourse: findings for a cohort of joiners. Soc. Forces 87:1211–42
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Burawoy M. 2005. For public sociology. Am. Sociol. Rev. 70:14–28
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Cai Z, Maguire K, Winters J. 2019. Who benefits from local oil and gas employment? Labor market composition in the oil and gas industry in Texas and the rest of the United States. Energy Econ. 84:104515
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Calvert K. 2016. From ‘energy geography’ to ‘energy geographies’: perspectives on a fertile academic borderland. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 40:105–25
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Carley S, Evans T, Graff M, Konisky D. 2018. A framework for evaluating geographic disparities in energy transition vulnerability. Nat. Energy 3:8621–27
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Carroll W 2021. Regime of Obstruction: How Corporate Power Blocks Energy Democracy Athabasca, AB, Can.: Athabasca Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Cates K, Eaton P. 2019. As coal economy collapses, imminent public budget crisis confronts Hopi-Navajo tribes Work. Pap. Inst. Energy Econ. Financial Anal. Lakewood, OH:
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Chakraborty J, Basu P. 2019. Linking industrial hazards and social inequalities: environmental injustice in Gujarat, India. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16:142
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Chan S, Huff Stevens A. 1999. Employment and retirement following a late-career job loss. Am. Econ. Rev. 89:2211–16
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Chancel L. 2020. Unsustainable Inequalities: Social Justice and the Environment Cambridge, MA: Belknap
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Chandrashekeran S. 2021. Rent and reparation: how the law shapes Indigenous opportunities from large renewable energy projects. Local Environ. 26:3379–96
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Clark B, York R. 2005. Carbon metabolism: global capitalism, climate change, and the biospheric rift. Theory Soc. 34:4391–428
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Clemens E. 2007. Toward a historicized sociology: theorizing events, processes, and emergence. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 33:527–49
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Constantinescu I. 2012. Shrinking cities in Romania: former mining cities in Valea Jiului. Built Environ. 38:2214–28
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Couch K, Placzek D. 2010. Earnings losses of displaced workers revisited. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:1572–89
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Dechezleprêtre A, Glachant M, Haščič I, Johnstone N, Ménière Y. 2011. Invention and transfer of climate change–mitigation technologies: a global analysis. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 5:1109–30
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Driscoll D. 2021. Populism and carbon tax justice: the Yellow Vest movement in France. Soc. Probl. 70:143–63
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Dubash N. 2021. Varieties of climate governance: the emergence and functioning of climate institutions. Environ. Politics 30:sup11–25
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Dunlap A. 2018. Counterinsurgency for wind energy: the Bíi Hioxo Wind Park in Juchitán, Mexico. J. Peasant Stud. 45:3630–52
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Dussaux D, Dechezleprêtre A, Glachant M. 2018. Intellectual property rights protection and the international transfer of low-carbon technologies Work. Pap. 323 Cent. Climate Change Econ. Policy London:
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Eaton E, Day N. 2020. Petro-pedagogy: fossil fuel interests and the obstruction of climate justice in public education. Environ. Educ. Res. 26:4457–73
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Ehrhardt-Martinez K, Rudel T, Norgaard KM, Broadbent J 2016. Mitigating climate change. Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives R Dunlap, R Brulle 199–234. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Fairhead J, Leach M, Scoones I. 2012. Green grabbing: a new appropriation of nature?. J. Peasant Stud. 39:2237–61
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Falzon D. 2021. The ideal delegation: how institutional privilege silences “developing” nations in the UN climate negotiations. Soc. Probl. 70:185–202
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Farrell J. 2015. Politics: echo chambers and false certainty. Nat. Clim. Change 5:8719–20
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Farrell J. 2016. Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change. PNAS 113:192–97
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Farrell J, McConnell K, Brulle R. 2019. Evidence-based strategies to combat scientific misinformation. Nat. Clim. Change 9:3191–95
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Fischer L. 1926. Oil Imperialism: The International Struggle for Petroleum New York: International
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Fisher D. 2006. Bringing the material back in: understanding the US position on climate change. Sociol. Forum. 21:3467–94
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Foster JB. 2008. Peak oil and energy imperialism. Mon. Rev. 60:312–33
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Foster JB, Clark B, York R. 2011. The Ecological Rift: Capitalism's War on the Earth New York: NYU Press
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Foster JB, Holleman H. 2012. Weber and the environment: classical foundations for a postexemptionalist sociology. Am. J. Sociol. 117:61625–73
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Frank AG. 1966. The development of underdevelopment. Mon. Rev. 18:417–31
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Freese J, Kevern JA. 2013. Types of causes. Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research SL Morgan 27–41. New York: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Freudenburg WR. 1992. Addictive economies: extractive industries and vulnerable localities in a changing world economy. Rural Sociol. 57:3305–32
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Freudenburg WR, Gramling R. 1994. Oil in Troubled Waters: Perceptions, Politics, and the Battle over Offshore Drilling Albany: N. Y. State Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Freudenburg WR, Wilson L. 2002. Mining the data: analyzing the economic effects of mining on rural communities. Sociol. Inq. 72:4549–75
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Gangl M. 2006. Scar effects of unemployment: an assessment of institutional complementarities. Am. Sociol. Rev. 71:6986–1013
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Godby R, Coupal R, Taylor D, Considine T. 2015. Potential impacts on Wyoming coal production of EPA's greenhouse gas proposals. Electr. J. 28:568–79
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Gonzalez D, Nardone A, Nguyen A, Morello-Frosch R, Casey A. 2022. Historic redlining and the siting of oil and gas wells in the United States. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 33:176–83
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Graff M, Carley S, Konisky D. 2018. Stakeholder perceptions of the United States energy transition: local-level dynamics and community responses to national politics and policy. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 43:144–57
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Granovetter M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78:61360–80
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Grant D, Jorgenson A, Longhofer W. 2020. Super Polluters: Tackling the World's Largest Sites of Climate-Disrupting Emissions New York: Columbia Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Green T, Knittel C. 2020. Distributed effects of climate policy: a machine learning approach Work. Pap. MIT Cent. Energy Environ. Policy Cambridge, MA:
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Hemmerling S, DeMyers C, Parfait J. 2021. Tracing the flow of oil and gas: a spatial and temporal analysis of environmental justice in coastal Louisiana from 1980 to 2010. Environ. Justice 14:2134–45
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Hochschild AR. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right New York: New Press
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Honneth A. 1992. Integrity and disrespect: principles of a conception of morality based on the theory of recognition. Political Theory 20:2187–201
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Huber M. 2022. Climate Change as Class War: Building Socialism on a Warming Planet London: Verso
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Huber M, McCarthy J. 2017. Beyond the subterranean energy regime? Fuel, land use and the production of space. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 42:4655–68
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Hudson R. 2005. Rethinking change in old industrial regions: reflecting on the experiences of north east England. Environ. Plan. A 37:4581–96
    [Google Scholar]
  70. IPCC (Intergov. Panel Clim. Change) 2022. Summary for policymakers. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change H-O Pörtner, DC Roberts, M Tignor, ES Poloczanska, K Mintenbeck et al. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Jacobsen GD, Parker DP. 2016. The economic aftermath of resource booms: evidence from boomtowns in the American West. Econ. J. 126:5931092–128
    [Google Scholar]
  72. James W, Jia C, Kedia S. 2012. Uneven magnitude of disparities in cancer risks from air toxics. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 9:124365–85
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Jasanoff S, Simmet HR. 2021. Renewing the future: excluded imaginaries in the global energy transition. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 80:102205
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Jerolmack C. 2021. Up to Heaven and Down to Hell: Fracking, Freedom, and Community in an American Town Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Jerolmack C, Walker E. 2018. Please in my backyard: quiet mobilization in support of fracking in an Appalachian community. Am. J. Sociol. 124:2479–516
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Joassart-Marcelli P, Musso J, Wolch J. 2005. Fiscal consequences of concentrated poverty in a metropolitan region. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 95:2336–56
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Kalleberg A. 2011. Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Kent M. 2013. Moguls and Mandarins London: Taylor and Francis. , 1st ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Kirby C. 2016. From ‘energy geography’ to ‘energy geographies.’. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 40:1105–25
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Kollmeyer C, Pichler F. 2013. Is deindustrialization causing high unemployment in affluent countries? Evidence from 16 OECD countries, 1970–2003. Soc. Forces 91:3785–812
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Laes E, Gorissen L, Nevens F. 2014. A comparison of energy transition governance in Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Sustainability 6:31129–52
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Laumann E, Knoke D. 1987. The Organizational State: Social Change in National Policy Domains Madison: Univ. Wisc. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Lawrence R. 2014. Internal colonization and Indigenous resource sovereignty: wind power developments on traditional Saami lands. Environ. Plan. D 32:61036–53
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Lewis SL, Maslin M. 2018. The Human Planet: How We Created the Anthropocene New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Lobao L, Zhou M, Partridge M, Betz M. 2016. Poverty, place, and coal employment across Appalachia and the United States in a new economic era. Rural Sociol. 81:3343–86
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Mah A, Wang X. 2019. Accumulated injuries of environmental injustice: living and working with petrochemical pollution in Nanjing, China. Ann. Am. Assoc Geogr. 109:61961–77
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Malm A. 2016. Fossil Capital: The Rise of Steam-Power and the Roots of Global Warming London: Verso
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Mann M. 2012. The Sources of Social Power: Vol. 4, Globalizations, 1945–2011 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Marx K. 1978. The Poverty of Philosophy: Answer to the “Philosophy of Poverty.” Peking: Foreign Lang. , 1st ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Marx K, Engels F. 1977. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy New York: Vintage
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Maxwell NI. 2004. Environmental injustices of energy facilities. Encyclopedia Energy 2:503–15
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Mayer A. 2019. Partisanship, politics, and the energy transition in the United States: a critical review and conceptual framework. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 53:85–88
    [Google Scholar]
  93. McCarthy J. 2015. A socioecological fix to capitalist crisis and climate change? The possibilities and limits of renewable energy. Environ. Plan. A 47:122485–502
    [Google Scholar]
  94. McCrea R, Walton A, Leonard R. 2016. Developing a model of community wellbeing and resilience in response to change. Soc. Indic. Res. 129:1195–214
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Meckling J. 2021. Making industrial policy work for decarbonization. Glob. Environ. Politics 21:4134–47
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Mendelevitch R, Hauenstein C, Holz F. 2019. The death spiral of coal in the U.S.: Will changes in U.S. policy turn the tide?. Clim. Policy 19:101310–24
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Mitchell T. 2011. Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil London: Verso
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Mohai P, Saha R. 2015. Which came first, people or pollution? A review of theory and evidence from longitudinal environmental justice studies. Environ. Res. Lett. 10:12
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Mohr J, Ghaziani A. 2014. Problems and prospects of measurement in the study of culture. Theory Soc. 43:3225–46
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Molloy R, Smith C, Wozniak A. 2017. Job changing and the decline in long-distance migration in the United States. Demography 54:2631–53
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Mueller JT. 2021. The dual dependency of natural-resource-rich labor markets in contemporary society. Sociol. Theory 39:281–102
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Newell P, Mulvaney D. 2013. The political economy of the ‘just transition. ’. Geogr. J. 179:2132–40
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Nielsen F, Alderson A. 1997. The Kuznets curve and the great U-turn: income inequality in U.S. counties, 1970 to 1990. Am. Sociol. Rev. 62:112–33
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Nordensvard J, Zhou Y, Zhang X. 2018. Innovation core, innovation semi-periphery and technology transfer: the case of wind energy patents. Energy Policy 120:213–27
    [Google Scholar]
  105. O'Sullivan K, Golubchikov O, Mehmood A. 2020. Uneven energy transitions: understanding continued energy peripheralization in rural communities. Energy Policy 138:1–8
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Pasetto R, Mattioli B, Marsili D. 2019. Environmental justice in industrially contaminated sites. A review of scientific evidence in the WHO European region. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16:6998–1018
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Perdue RT, Pavela G. 2012. Addictive economies and coal dependency. Organ. Environ. 25:4368–84
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Podobnik B. 2008. Global Energy Shifts: Fostering Sustainability in a Turbulent World Philadelphia, PA: Temple Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Prasad M. 2022. Hidden benefits and dangers of carbon tax. PLOS Clim. 1:7e0000052
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Price RH, Choi JN, Vinokur A. 2002. Links in the chain of adversity following job loss. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 7:4302–12
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Price RH, Friedland D, Vinokur A. 1998. Job loss: hard times and eroded identity. Perspectives on Loss: A Sourcebook J Harvey 303–16. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Quadagno J. 2004. Why the United States has no national health insurance: stakeholder mobilization against the welfare state, 1945–1996. J. Health Soc. Behav. 45:25–44
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Raiser K, Naims H, Bruhn T. 2017. Corporatization of the climate? Innovation, intellectual property rights, and patents for climate change mitigation. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 27:1–8
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Rayer S, Brown DL. 2001. Geographic diversity of inter-county migration in the United States, 1980–1995. Pop. Res. Policy Rev. 20:3229–52
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Riofrancos T. 2022. The security–sustainability nexus: lithium onshoring in the Global North. Glob. Environ. Politics 23:11–22
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Rodríguez-Muñiz M. 2017. Cultivating consent: nonstate leaders and the orchestration of state legibility. Am. J. Sociol. 123:2385–425
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Roemer KF, Haggerty JH. 2021. Coal communities and the U.S. energy transition: a policy corridors assessment. Energy Policy 151:112112
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Ross ML. 2012. The Oil Curse: How Petroleum Wealth Shapes the Development of Nations Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Rueschemeyer D, Huber Stephens E, Huber JD 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Russell EP, Allison J, Finger T, Brown J, Balogh B, Carlson WB. 2011. The nature of power: synthesizing the history of technology and environmental history. Technol. Cult. 52:2246–59
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Safford S. 2009. Why the Garden Club Couldn't Save Youngstown: The Transformation of the Rust Belt Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Sampson R, Morenoff J, Earls F. 1999. Beyond social capital: spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. Am. Sociol. Rev. 64:5633–60
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Sampson R, Raudenbush S, Earls F. 1997. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277:5328918–24
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Scoones I. 2009. A Global Land Grab? London: Lond. Inst. Dev. Stud.
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Scott DN, Smith A. 2017.. “ Sacrifice zones” in the green energy economy: toward an environmental justice framework. McGill Law J. 62:3861–98
    [Google Scholar]
  126. [Google Scholar]
  127. Sovacool B. 2016. How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 13:202–15
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Sovacool B. 2021. Who are the victims of low-carbon transitions? Towards a political ecology of climate change mitigation. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 73:101916
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Stephenson J, Barton B, Carrington G, Gnoth D, Lawson R, Thorsnes P. 2010. Energy cultures: a framework for understanding energy behaviors. . Energy Policy 38:106120–29
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Stern D, Kaufmann R. 2013. Anthropogenic and natural causes of climate change. Clim. Change 122:1–2257–69
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Stokes LC. 2020. Short Circuiting Policy: Interest Groups and the Battle over Clean Energy and Climate Policy in the American States Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Ulrich-Schad JD, Henly M, Safford TG. 2013. The role of community assessments, place, and the great recession in the migration intentions of rural Americans. Rural Sociol. 78:3371–98
    [Google Scholar]
  133. van der Horst D. 2007. NIMBY or Not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies. Energy Policy 35:52705–14
    [Google Scholar]
  134. Viterna J. 2013. Women in War: The Micro-Processes of Mobilization in El Salvador Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  135. Wetts R. 2020. In climate news, statements from large businesses and opponents of climate action receive heightened visibility. PNAS 117:3219054–60
    [Google Scholar]
  136. Williams CL. 2021. Gaslighted: How the Oil and Gas Industry Shortchanges Women Scientists Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Wilson WJ. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  138. Wilson WJ. 1996. When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor New York: Knopf. , 1st ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  139. Winegard TC. 2016. The First World Oil War Toronto, ON, Can.: Univ. Toronto Press
    [Google Scholar]
  140. Wolman H, Stokan E, Wial H. 2015. Manufacturing job loss in U.S. deindustrialized regions—its consequences and implications for the future. Econ. Dev. Q. 29:2102–12
    [Google Scholar]
  141. Worth K. 2021. Miseducation: How Climate Change Is Taught in America New York: Columbia Glob. Rep.
    [Google Scholar]
  142. Wu SY, Korman H. 1987. Socioeconomic impacts of disinvestment on communities in New York State. Am. J. Econ. Sociol. 46:3261–71
    [Google Scholar]
  143. Young C. 2012. Losing a job: the nonpecuniary cost of unemployment in the United States. Soc. Forces 91:2609–33
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-012201
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error